When does PR measurement look beyond attribution to prove communications value?

  • Hannah Kitchener
  • Associate Director
  • September 14, 2026
AI-generated image using Google Gemini
Communications creates value beyond the content it produces and the outcomes it can directly attribute. The challenge for marketing and communications leaders is showing the wider contribution and building a credible business case for continued investment.

Key takeaways

• Measurement, attribution, and business value each answer a different question.

• Communications creates value through more than the content and campaigns it produces.

• Some of its most important contributions are found in better understanding, stronger relationships, sharper positioning, and useful market intelligence.

• The strongest business case combines quantitative measures with qualitative evidence and connects communications activity to the organisational priorities it supports.

• We can’t attribute every contribution communication makes, so the focus should be on showing the wider value and why that matters.

Every marketing or communications leader eventually faces some version of “What are we getting for this investment?” When a business is allocating budget, headcount, and resources to a function, leadership needs to understand the value it creates. The trouble is that the answer is often reduced to the things that are easiest to count – media mentions, impressions, website traffic, engagement, and leads. Those numbers can tell you something useful, but they don’t necessarily tell you what the communications function is worth to the organisation. A communications team can produce impressive numbers without making much difference to the business. Equally, it can make an important contribution that is difficult to trace to single campaign or transaction.

Communications as a listening and sense-making function

The trap we can all fall into is thinking purely about content when that is only part of what a communications function does. Consider a product launch. A communications team might interview customers, dealers, engineers, and product specialists to develop the campaign. The obvious output is the content and trade media coverage, but those conversations might also reveal that customers care far less about a certain feature than the product team had initially assumed. Or that dealers are encountering the same objection frequently. Or that competitors are beginning to position the product category differently.

Those observations can change the messaging, the campaign, and the sales conversations surrounding the launch. There is no attribution model that can reliably put a monetary value on the insight, but the organisation has learnt something it didn’t know before and may have changed what it does as a result. That is the intelligence hiding inside the work.

And what if a communications team advises against a particular strategy, topic, or message? There is no content output (so no coverage or engagement to measure) and no tangible outcome (so no leads to attribute), so it is difficult to prove that that action or inaction protected reputation or maintained a customer relationship, even if that’s what it effectively achieved.

The value of communications is cumulative

The other issue is that industrial businesses rarely win or lose customers through a single communications touchpoint. A customer might encounter a company through a trade media article, salesperson, dealer, tradeshow, technical webinar, colleague’s recommendation, and LinkedIn post – all before making a decision. Which one caused the sale? There is no way of knowing as reputation, understanding, and relationships work cumulatively. It’s usually when something changes – a new product launches, a competitor enters the market, a crisis emerges, or the business wants to enter a new sector – that the value of those accumulated assets suddenly becomes more apparent.

So what should a B2B communications leader actually show?

A good report might answer five questions.

1. What did we produce?

Coverage, content, campaigns, events, and stakeholder activity demonstrate delivery and efficiency.

2. What happened?

Engagement, enquiries, awareness, reputation, relationships, pipeline contribution, or other relevant outcomes show what changed as a result.

3. What did we learn?

What did customers tell us? What were journalists interested in? What were competitors doing? What concerns were emerging? What assumptions turned out to be wrong? This shows the intelligence generated through communications activity.

4. What changed because we knew it?

Did the insight alter a message, campaign, customer conversation, or strategic decision? This demonstrates influence.

5. What should happen next?

What should we continue, change, stop, or invest in? This turns reporting into something useful to the wider business.

The quantitative evidence shows what happened, while the qualitative evidence provides context and helps explain why it matters. Rather than simply stating “We produced 20 pieces of content”, we can show “These were the priorities we supported, this is what happened, this is what we learnt, this is what changed, and this is where we think communications can create the most value next.”

Yes, we can see what the function created or what it can directly attribute. But part of the case for continued investment in communications is what the organisation learnt, understood, changed, and enabled because communications was doing its job.

If you’re finding it difficult to demonstrate the value of communications beyond activity metrics and marketing attribution, the SE10 team would be happy to talk through how to build a more meaningful picture of contribution and impact. Let’s start a conversation.

Hannah Kitchener

Associate Director

About the author

Hannah is an associate director in the UK, leading strategic campaigns for industrial clients across the EMEA region. A professionally qualified journalist (NCTJ), she combines specialist sectoral knowledge in construction, energy, and materials handling with a strong network of trade media contacts to secure valuable coverage. Her expertise in inter-cultural communication, honed by degrees in modern languages and translation, is key to executing campaigns that succeed across diverse European markets.

Explore further

How do you get to the right public relations agency quicker?

PR agency selection processes can generate a lot of information before you have a clear sense of which organisations would be genuinely suited to the brief. From the agency side of the table, we’ve noticed that a simple qualification stage can make the journey to finding the right partner more focused and more revealing.

Read More »

Get the News at 10

Join our monthly briefing for the latest industrial insights and cultural highlights from the SE10 blog.
We respect your privacy and you can unsubscribe at any time.